All Activity

Of course he doesn’t. Which dictator does?

The study was conducted for CNN via web and telephone on the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel of U.S. adults ages 18 or older recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. SSRS is an independent research company. Surveys were obtained January 9-12, 2026, with a representative sample of n=1,209 respondents. The margin of sampling error for total respondents is +/-3.1 at the 95% confidence level. The design effect is 1.3.

The cuntfaces in the White House don’t give a fuck about any polls

Is that a nationwide poll, something like a referendum result, or a poll from CNN that MAGAs (who elected Trump with majority) don't watch? Cause if it's the latter, we should repeat the same exercise on FOX news and then calculate the real results...

According to Politico, 75% of Americans oppose Trump’s push on Greenland: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/15/trump-greenland-poll-00731009?utm_source=semafor

I wonder how US citizens feel about recognising evil in Russia's invasion of Ukraine in relation to their president simply spilling US needs Greenland. Like, what's the difference? And honestly this is not just a Trump problem. Every administration, left and right, had a history of inflicting war around the globe, all the while the left wing presidents were receiving Nobel prizes for peace in a blatant display of hypocrisy. Trump is just an arrogant idiot who just doesn't know how to wear a mask.

He’ll do just about anything to avoid releasing the Epstein Files. Fascist cunt.

if this is his only answer to the world being against him invading Greenland, then we are safe.well, until his next tantrum

Guy Verhofstadt has been going on about this since the 90s and just about everyone mocked him for it. Anyway, fuck America.

Am I the only one who thinks this is highly disrespectful towards the Nobel Peace Prize Commitee? But I guess, they somehow deserve it. As far as I understood, the decision for Machado was met with a lot of criticism, even before she was awarded because she is such a controversial figure. Considering this very much looks like selling out to Trump, makes me believe Venezuela will have a hard time vote for her as president. He clearly stated he wants to plunder all the oil and she is giving him a prize, a prize that is not his in the first place. Not a good look. Also, what about the approx. 1 million Euro she received in relation to the Nobel Peace Prize? Did she say, she will donate the money to some cause? Will she keep it to herself? Will she transfer the money to Trump?

The whole thing is just ridiculous. They kidnapped Maduro but left his government in place. Since regime change in foreign countries is not popular with U.S. voters, because whenever the U.S. tried it, they failed miserably, Trump and Co. changed to narrative to "oil". But here is the problem: No one (at least not U.S. executives) wants that oil. So, maybe, just maybe, this is about the Nobel Peace Prize Trump did not get? Well, I believe Venezuela is merely a testing ground for Cuba, which is the ultimate goal.

The EU has almost the exact same amount of active duty soldiers as U.S. forces. BUT the U.S. is only able to send an estimated 250.000 soldies to Europe, because they are too far involved around the globe and cannot afford to send troops from other regions without the risk of losing influence in that region. Influence they have been craving for for at least 80 years. As far as I know, the U.S. have a far bigger airforce, whereas the EU has a bigger navy. The number of tanks is almost the same. Of course, the arsenal of nuclear weapons does not need to be discussed. The bigger issue is that all those EU countries use different weapon systems, which are very hard to connect to other weapon systems. THIS is the real advantage of the U.S. forces. That all their systems, and they don't have that many, are interconnected. And the U.S. is better at logistics. Well, if a country constantly involves itself in every conflict around the globe, surely they have more expertise. The thing is, the U.S. cannot risk a military conflict with the EU. Not because they would lose some sort of war. But the U.S. needs the EU as a strategic partner and most above all as a market for their products and services. Furthermore, European countries hold a lot of U.S. debt, if they all decided to get rid of it, it is highly likely to crash the U.S. economy and it will end the dollar based world economy as we know it. It will harm the EU countries as well, no doubt about it. In the end, the US are not as invulnerable as they think.

I wonder if the European army would be comparable with the American and the Chinese.

Oh yes.

Actually I am not convinced that most Americans regret having him represent them. There are enough red states where the populace see Europe as "free riding" on USA military umbrella. Actually I do not think soon (unless FAR RIGHT and fascist speech is forbidden in USA) there will be approachment between USA and EU. EU are acting absurdly. They should be signing a treaty already 1) establishing an EU army (that includes UK and Canada parts) that unites all armies of the EU states that have signed it 2) that stipulates that foreign affairs of the EU shall be decided ONLY with qualified majority AND 3) that only EU states (plus UK and Canada) that have signed that treaty are to be protected by the EU army. Those 3 matters should be a PACKAGE DEAL. That would leave off Hungary to deal with Putin or/and Trump alone. And that treaty should be applied from signing until the ratification is finalised. The EU army should have been already established. That's the only way to deal with Trump. And that army should have been sent to Greenland.