Rebel Heartbreaker Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 That NME review has a lot of factual errors. Orbit helmed ALL of MDNA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Routa Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 And the worst is that that NME review counts for metacritic as far as I know.... Oh well, let's hope there will be more good reviews too! RH truly deserves them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Django Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 NME review sounds so bitter and pressed. Really, has the "reviewer" heard the album? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonaz Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 That nme review is so wrong and disgusting piece of shit. What the hell devil pray has anything do do with lady gaga's music. If Rebel Heart was made by young pop star like katy perry or rihanna everybody would be praising it as album of decade. I hate so much of these so called reviews which only focus on her age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 I'm enraged by the ignorant NME review, but let's try to focus on the fact that it's the only truly bad (official) one so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightcutter Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 NME normally give her good reviews. Not sure what's happened here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikki Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 Im so angry! can't we mail NME about it? this guy got so much shit wrong. its not professional! how can he get away with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debord Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 This is the writer of the NME review https://twitter.com/gavhaynes . No surprise that he writes for the sexist rag that is Vice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollap Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 I didn't realise NME had such poorly informed writers. Really astounded.Does he know that M practically invented this sub genre of folk-tronica back in the year 2000? He throws bile at her just for collaborating with a lot of different producers when he should be impressed at how she's fused it all together. Just lazy, tabloid journalism completely wrong for a self-styled serious music rag. It's fair enough if he feels some of the youth-orientated tracks are not honest enough (personally I disagree on that) but then when she does a 'grown up' track like Devil Pray he dismisses it and calls it GaGa like. What? How ? Sack this piece of shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adirondak Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 I didn't realise NME had such poorly informed writers. Really astounded.Does he know that M practically invented this sub genre of folk-tronica back in the year 2000? He throws bile at her just for collaborating with a lot of different producers when he should be impressed at how she's fused it all together. Just lazy, tabloid journalism completely wrong for a self-styled serious music rag. It's fair enough if he feels some of the youth-orientated tracks are not honest enough (personally I disagree on that) but then when she does a 'grown up' track like Devil Pray he dismisses it and calls it GaGa like. What? How ? Sack this piece of shit. yea comparing it to Gagas oh so authentic track about... Wearing a burqa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikki Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 thats what i mean with those ignorant new teens rewriting history. it scares me as fuck. in a few years all the professional writers who know M of the 80s and do their research are gonna stop writing reviews & articles and we have to relay on those incompetent pretentious 20-something who get their info from other uninformed twinks like tyler oakley & social media Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Barthes Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 I don't want to read it but can you check if it's in the official NME review part or if this is a contributor's blog ? In my heart in know she made a good album so the reviews don't hurt me at all, it's not like the MDNA reviews i had to agree with without wanting to admit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cesky Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 I don't want to read it but can you check if it's in the official NME review part or if this is a contributor's blog ? In my heart in know she made a good album so the reviews don't hurt me at all, it's not like the MDNA reviews i had to agree with without wanting to admit it. Yeah, I have a lot of confidence in the quality of Rebel Heart. Erotica and Bedtime Stories both got some poor reviews when they were released, and now everyone pretends they've always loved them. I think Rebel Heart will be looked back on as a highlight; I just wish people could realize what they have when they have it but such is life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrolla Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 thats what i mean with those ignorant new teens rewriting history. it scares me as fuck. in a few years all the professional writers who know M of the 80s and do their research are gonna stop writing reviews & articles and we have to relay on those incompetent pretentious 20-something who get their info from other uninformed twinks like tyler oakley & social media I know, it's awful, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vocalism Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 After reading all your griping about this NME review, I wanted to say you guys need to get over it, stop attacking writers for not liking everything Madonna does, etc. etc. But after actually reading the review, I was like WTF? How did this get published? It's like a bad blog by a teenager. I have ZERO problem with the substantive issues the writer has with the album, and I actually agree with some of it. HOWEVER, here it is, annotated by me: Three years after 2012’s EDM-driven ‘MDNA’ album, ‘Rebel Heart’ finds 56-year-old Madonna still trying to pass herself off as a teenager. (FINE, BUT THERE ARE SO MANY MORE ELOQUENT WAYS TO EXPRESS THIS) It’s a disconnect that has become increasingly grating. Rather than the return to ’80s underground New York promised by lead single ‘Living For Love’, her 13th album is a scattergun attempt to hit all the bases of modern pop. Instead of having one producer at the helm, as ‘MNDA’ did with William Orbit, (UH, NO. I WISH.) Madonna hired the biggest chart-humping names she could find. Avicii co-writes three tracks: ‘HeartBreakCity’, ‘Devil Pray’ – reminiscent of Lady Gaga’s crazed 2013 dance tune ‘Aura’ (HUH? I GUESS I CAN SEE HOW SOMEONE WOULD HEAR A GAGA INFLUENCE HERE BECAUSE IT'S GOT A GOTH VIBE TO IT, BUT "AURA"??) – and the ballad ‘Wash All Over Me’. Kanye produces three: the classy, (I LOVE THIS SONG, BUT CLASSY? OKAY...) ‘Vogue’-referencing ‘Illuminati’, ‘Holy Water’ and ‘Wash All Over Me’. Diplo drives four: ‘Bitch I’m Madonna’, ‘Unapologetic Bitch’, ‘Living For Love’, ‘Hold Tight’. And Drake associates Dahi and Michael ‘Blood’ Diamonds take two: ‘Devil Pray’ and ‘Body Shop’. Chance The Rapper (trendy) and Nicki Minaj (bankable) rap on ‘Iconic’ and ‘Bitch I’m Madonna’ respectively. Diplo fares best. The pulsating ‘Living For Love’ is exactly what this record should have been top-to-tail, and the digi-reggae of ‘Unapologetic Bitch’ could’ve fallen off the back of a Major Lazer album. Diplo makes Madge sound fun, but as the candy-bass ‘Bitch I’m Madonna’ – on which she sings “We’re jumping in the pool and swimming with our clothes on / I poured beer in my shoe and got my freak on” – shows, the gulf between her life and her music is now impossible to ignore. The punchy ‘HeartBreakCity’ – a song Lorde would dismiss as too juvenile an interpretation of a break-up (SERIOUSLY?) – illustrates that however on-point her musical instincts, this persona just isn’t believable any more. (WHAT ISN'T BELIEVABLE ABOUT THIS? IT'S ONE OF THE MOST HONEST SONGS ON THE ALBUM) ‘Holy Water’ implores, “Kiss it better, kiss it better / Make it better, make it wetter / Don’t it taste like holy water”. Coitus in mid-life can of course still be a richly rewarding experience, (HOW WOULD THIS GUY KNOW? HE LOOKS ABOUT 15.) but must we hear quite so many details? (GROSS! OLD PEOPLE HAVING SEX! WAY TO EXEMPLIFY AGEISM BY THE LETTER, JACKASS) Twee ballad ‘Body Shop’ hinges on a similarly tortuous lyrical conceit (“My transmission’s blown… You can keep it in overnight / You can do whatever you like”). Ultimately, ‘Rebel Heart’ feels like a wasted opportunity. Trite self-empowerment anthem ‘Iconic’ informs us that there’s only two letters difference between Icon and I Can’t. Sadly, there are also two letters between class and ass. This is the writer of the NME review https://twitter.com/gavhaynes . No surprise that he writes for the sexist rag that is Vice. Also racist, or at least diversity-challenged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXL Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 An extremely twatty, and ageist, NME review: http://allaboutmadonna.com/2015/03/nme-review-of-madonnas-rebel-heart-album.php LOL what happened to once respectable publications? That could have been written by teenager I can't even They're all just bitter at Madonna's 32 years residence at the very top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PRPapi Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 So I sat down to write my review of Rebel Heart and ended up writing a 2000 word essay. Oops. Some of you might be interested (it's very positive!) http://howupsetting.com/2015/03/03/rebel-heart/ AWESOME article and review! I absolutely LOVED it! And, I really enjoy the way you write. :thumbs up: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrolla Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 It's alarming at how all these little monsters all of a sudden have jobs on music websites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runa Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 After reading all your griping about this NME review, I wanted to say you guys need to get over it, stop attacking writers for not liking everything Madonna does, etc. etc. But after actually reading the review, I was like WTF? How did this get published? It's like a bad blog by a teenager. I have ZERO problem with the substantive issues the writer has with the album, and I actually agree with some of it. HOWEVER, here it is, annotated by me: Well... have you seen his Twitter pic? The guy is a teenager, indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikki Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 thats what i said about him and also the one from PMA. they're both very young and little monsters (actually the PMA one says shit like "gay for gaga" on his twitter all the time while shading madonna for the brits.) - so.. how could they allow this? certainly NME must see the complaints and read it as well and realise it's indeed a very inaccurate written "review". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graffitiheart Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 Just ignore these bad reviews and promote the good ones on Twitter, these so called "writers" pay check depends on clicks and attention, the less people read them and give them importance the better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
side_streets Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 thats what i said about him and also the one from PMA. they're both very young and little monsters (actually the PMA one says shit like "gay for gaga" on his twitter all the time while shading madonna for the brits.) - so.. how could they allow this? certainly NME must see the complaints and read it as well and realise it's indeed a very inaccurate written "review". "Gays for Gaga"... Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coadf Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 This piece of shit is not professional. And i don't say this just because he rated badly Rebel Heart. His ''review'' is not about Rebel Heart but more about Madonna and his irrelevant opinion. Americans must be brainwashed if they read these shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ai Papi Si. Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 This piece of shit is not professional. And i don't say this just because he rated badly Rebel Heart. His ''review'' is not about Rebel Heart but more about Madonna and his irrelevant opinion. Americans must be brainwashed if they read these shit. NME is a UK publication... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runa Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 "Gays for Gaga"... Seriously? it says a lot about this guy, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coadf Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 NME is a UK publication... Whatever My point is there are not profesional reviewers as they were once! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pud Whacker Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 Critics are purposely misunderstanding this record, that's what gets to me. It's really like American Life all over again... Please explain to us what you believe they are misunderstanding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ai Papi Si. Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 It's a review full of low blows, but poorly written and blatant in its sexism. I only agree that Madonna needs to stop making stupid songs like BIM which yes, sound hugely disconnected from her life and are extremely infantile. She's entitled to express herself however she wants, but if you ask my opinion there it is. Since when does Madonna party like Ke$ha? It's just not convincing. Anyway. The review sounds like it was written in 2 minutes by a 19 year old. Who briefly glanced at a Wikipedia page on RH. Hire a new staff, NME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Barthes Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 About the NME check if this is not from their blogs section and if this is a contributor and not a professional reviewer. I don't want to give it a hit by checking myself. Is it staff or contributors, is it in the review section or blogs ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pud Whacker Posted March 4, 2015 Share Posted March 4, 2015 I'm finding it more difficult to read the fans reactions to the critics more than the criticisms themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts