Guest bluejean Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Probably logic? There's no way Madonna would have expected or wanted to give up 50% writing credit for that sample. Didn't she say Stuart talked her into keeping the sample? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Probably logic? There's no way Madonna would have expected or wanted to give up 50% writing credit for that sample. Didn't she say Stuart talked her into keeping the sample? Didn't she fly to Sweeden to play it to them personally and ask? They don't usually allow samples. She got her own way but obviously she was in a generous mood. (or they knew they had a hit on their hands and said 50/50 or nothing). It would've been great to be a fly on the wall at the meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 ^ I think she said she sent an assistant. (Because in one interview, she was quick to add that it was a FEMALE assistant, and then made jokes about her most "fetching" assistant.) Could be recalling incorrectly, but that's what I remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 ^ I think she said she sent an assistant. (Because in one interview, she was quick to add that it was a FEMALE assistant, and then made jokes about her most "fetching" assistant.) Could be recalling incorrectly, but that's what I remember. Ah youre probably right. I might've read a twisted version in bloody heat magazine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carta Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Sorry, and you'd say this based on what insights into their thinking exactly? Your psychic connection with them? Andersson 'Well we had this wonderful letter from her. I framed it. Very sweet. Her assistant came over to Stockholm with a CD and we played it. And we thought the record was great. But also realising that without the 'Gimme! Gimme!' thing in it, it wouldn't have been so great. So we said, "Well, fine, of course you can. But we just split the copyright, half-half."' Notice I said "I'd say", although perhaps you would have found my comments easier to accept if I'd been a bit clearer and said "In my opinion" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carta Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Probably logic? There's no way Madonna would have expected or wanted to give up 50% writing credit for that sample. Didn't she say Stuart talked her into keeping the sample? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Well, she may have asked them personally (on the phone or something?) -- I just recall the bit about sending an assistant to play the track. And you're right -- they very rarely allow samples, so it was a victory that they allowed it. In all the press interviews, Madonna was very gracious and gushing about how much a fan she is/has been of ABBA, etc. So she didn't come across as bitter about the transaction. However, I'm sure she would have preferred to have kept more of the writing credits if possible. The sample does add to the song's catchy quality, but ... 50% seems a bit high. The song can stand on its own without the sample (even though it enhances it considerably). And the funny part is that the sample is from a very interstitial sequence of "Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight)" ... i dare say that the sample used isn't integral to the original ABBA composition. I mean, it's a part that stands out quite a bit, but ... it's not really necessary. So odd that they would insist on half the writing credits. Oh well. On with the new album discussion ... Sorry to go off topic a bit here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Andersson 'Well we had this wonderful letter from her. I framed it. Very sweet. Her assistant came over to Stockholm with a CD and we played it. And we thought the record was great. But also realising that without the 'Gimme! Gimme!' thing in it, it wouldn't have been so great. So we said, "Well, fine, of course you can. But we just split the copyright, half-half."' Notice I said "I'd say", although perhaps you would have found my comments easier to accept if I'd been a bit clearer and said "In my opinion" Ah! A letter ... that's right. I knew there was some other contact before the assistant. Madonna and her letters. She loves letters, and I love that about her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip The Switch Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I know I'm going to get shit for this but I want something dark, introspective and artistic. I don't want songs about candy, birthdays or cheerleaders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titty Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 The new Royksopp/Robyn track is immense. Take note Madonna. Fingers crossed we get something interesting and not pop fluff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeakMaker Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 i don't understand all the commotion about this Roysopp/Robyn tune. I have heard it and it's nothing new... it's a great track don't get me wrong and possibly better than a lot of crap going on right now but it's nothing we haven't heard before... it reminds me an awful lot of other dance tracks; same with the actual melody.. somehow reminds me of another song (can't remember title now though). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titty Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Yes it's nothing new. However it does highlight what can be achieved with good production. It's a record that can easily cross boundaries between pop audiences and the more discerning ear. Something Madonna has not managed to do since Coadf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightshade Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 i don't understand all the commotion about this Roysopp/Robyn tune. I have heard it and it's nothing new... it's a great track don't get me wrong and possibly better than a lot of crap going on right now but it's nothing we haven't heard before... it reminds me an awful lot of other dance tracks; same with the actual melody.. somehow reminds me of another song (can't remember title now though). I'm with you. It's not bad, and I like its darkness, but it's not anything that blew me away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tumbleweedt Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 NOT official info, but I just wanted to add that I think M headed back to LA. The Instagram accounts of her trainers show pics with a jet at LA airport. So, maybe more recording? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeakMaker Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 NOT official info, but I just wanted to add that I think M headed back to LA. The Instagram accounts of her trainers show pics with a jet at LA airport. So, maybe more recording? Maybe she's going to record tracks with Avicii.. i mean is it possible Madonna is just writing songs with some people( natalia Kills, mozella, symbolic one..) and leave the entire production to Avicii? Do we believe there's more to come from Avicii in terms of production or we already heard the best work from him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikki Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Yes it's nothing new. However it does highlight what can be achieved with good production. It's a record that can easily cross boundaries between pop audiences and the more discerning ear. Something Madonna has not managed to do since Coadf. i just listened to the 1m snippet and so far it sounds like many underground tracks. I like it, but I don't think it's special or different from what we've heard for years now. let's say it sounds like a very good produced track. I love the subtle elements and the clarity. you can tell the producer is a perfectionist... but other than that.. eh..then again I'm judging a snippet. maybe the full thing has a huge chorus, idk.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robster Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 The full track is a nearly 10 minutes long so this will probably build and change as it goes along. Judging this 1:30 minute track is VERY hard, but I do love what I've heard so far! Gorgeous production, awesome vocals and vocal production and cool lyrics which aren't as dim witted as 90% of the pop or dance music that is in the charts right now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 where can i hear this track that everyone here and facebook is talking about? send me a link please so i can catch myself up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mensch Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 We should probably take this to the Robyn thread but yeah it just sounds amazing cause I know what she's capable of and I know she's going to bring it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Gark Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 i just listened to the 1m snippet and so far it sounds like many underground tracks. I like it, but I don't think it's special or different from what we've heard for years now. let's say it sounds like a very good produced track. I love the subtle elements and the clarity. you can tell the producer is a perfectionist... but other than that.. eh..then again I'm judging a snippet. maybe the full thing has a huge chorus, idk.. That's exactly what a good first single has to have (along with a great production). A big chorus with a strong melody. GMAYL totally lacks it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pressston Posted April 16, 2014 Author Share Posted April 16, 2014 I really can't wait until the new single drops ! I'm sure we will have new music by the summer and i'm certain it will be really good. I didn't feel this way for her last two albums but this time i just know it. I can feel it's gonna be something warm, with a kind of summer vibe, a feel good track, but deep at the same time. I feel it's gonna be a perfect balance between everything - dance & pop - electronic & real instruments - and also i'm sure a surprising particular music genre will be part of the track (country, folk, banjo, i don't know something kinda unusual). This my prediction ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vocalism Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 That's exactly what a good first single has to have (along with a great production). A big chorus with a strong melody. GMAYL totally lacks it. Well, GGW has a strong hook and big chorus, but overall the track is still shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Gark Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Well, GGW has a strong hook and big chorus, but overall the track is still shit. Yes, and that's because of the lame and generic production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddykrueger86 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Yes, and that's because of the lame and generic production. This and her voice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markm Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 This and her voice. Her voice was over processed and robotic on GGW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightcutter Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 GGW was just shit. In every sense of the word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rachelle of London Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 GGW is brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaything Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Yeah, right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rachelle of London Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Is GGW gonna be on the new album? Why is it being discussed so much. It's 2014 now. Look forward to the new stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip The Switch Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Yes, and that's because of the lame and generic production. And the vocals. Plain terrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts