LSD
-
Posts
8,323 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by LSD
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 hours ago, Kilt said:
The solution is to apply measures that would severely dry up Putin's fininacial pools which are funding his invasion campaign.
The financial director of Gazprom has committed suicide earlier today in Sankt Petersburg. It's starting.
Good chance he was one of the ones who began talks with the rest of the Russo-petro business class about how much of a total financial liability Kremlin Gollum is now and got suicided by the FSB because Vlad got wind of it.
-
1 minute ago, promise to try said:
Actually, I think this is what he wanted.Now we are going to play his game.And I don´t know if NATO wanted this game too.
Vlad P. was close to pissing himself with nervousness and fear in front of all the bethroned oligarchs the other day not wanting them to pull the plug on his failed reign now that Russia's economy is backsliding into the stone age, the rubble is becoming a currency on par with Monopoly money, and their villas and yachts going to be confiscated by the nations they actually want to live in after robbing the Russian people blind to build their fortunes. Nobody on Earth hates Russia more than the Russian ruling class.
-
The U.S. has been struggling and really consistently failing to get most of Europe to view NATO as anything other than a cumbersome and borderline-irrelevant antique for most of the 21st century and now within a week it's become strategic priority #1 throughout the continent. Sweden and Finland will be stampeding to get in. Military spending is going to skyrocket in all involved nations for the foreseeable future and probably all of our lifetimes. An unprecedented extreme militarization in the east (the kind that Russian propaganda tried to evoke as a 'thing' which never actually existed...but certainly will exist now) will become a wholly uncontroversial baseline fact of European political life.
One of the biggest backfires in all of human history. Vlad P. is legitimately mentally ret@rded.
-
-
-
17 minutes ago, Paul said:
Yanis was my economics lecturer at first year uni. He was an average economist, and an ineffective finance minister. I guess he is entitled to his views, but this sounds like the worst approach. If Putin was really only concerned about NATO membership, he could have removed any reasons for nations wanting to join NATO. Instead he chose the opposite. It's clear that's not really his end game.
If he was legitimately concerned with the "borders and buffers" narrative he wouldn't be threatening Sweden at this point and declaring that even Scandinavia has 0 sovereignty but whatever Russia deigns it to have.
He's not really concerned much anymore with keeping up the whiny crybaby theatrics of the "victim of NATO" thing except with certain very small, very niche audiences (the RT viewership?), and buying into it at this point in the game feels more like an adherence to a prior ideology than anything else.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18 hours ago, Raider of the lost Ark said:
Regarding Nordstream 2. As far as I know, the pipeline was fully financed by Russia. No money from Germany. That said, I blame Germany in part for the gas situation. As mentioned in a previous post, they were warned about storage sites and that there is potential for extortion. I don't know, it often feels a if German goverments are way to naive to deal with countries like Russia or China.
Or bought off
Germany loses patience with ex-chancellor's Russia lobbying
Frankfurt (AFP) – Former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's close friendship with President Vladimir Putin and lucrative business dealings with Russia have for years been reluctantly tolerated at home.
But as war clouds gather over Ukraine and allies question Germany's resolve, Schroeder is increasingly seen as potential liability to new chancellor and fellow Social Democrat Olaf Scholz, fuelling calls for a clean break with the pro-Kremlin lobbyist.
"Schroeder is a burden to Germany's foreign policy and to his old party," Der Spiegel weekly wrote. "He has clear goals. Not for his country, but for himself."
Schroeder's recent warning to Ukraine to stop its "sabre rattling" was met with widespread disbelief in Germany, even among longtime friends within the centre-left SPD party.
Last week's announcement that the 77-year-old is set to serve on the board of Russian state energy giant Gazprom did little to calm tempers, as did the revelation that Schroeder held talks about Russia with an SPD interior ministry official last month.
The controversy comes at an awkward time for Scholz, who faces a major test next week when he travels to Moscow for his first in-person talks with Putin since taking office.
Scholz has been accused of being slow to step into the diplomatic fray in the Ukraine crisis, and of muddying Germany's message of being united with allies against the Russian threat.
Nord Stream 2
After much prodding from the United States and other allies, Scholz recently toughened his stance on possible sanctions should Russia invade Ukraine, including halting the Gazprom-owned Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.
It was Schroeder, chancellor from 1998-2005, who signed off on the first Nord Stream pipeline between Russia and Germany in his final weeks in office, and he currently heads the Nord Stream company's shareholders' committee.
He is also chairman of the board of directors of Russian oil giant Rosneft.
In a TV interview, Scholz denied being influenced by Schroeder ahead of the Moscow trip.
"I haven't asked him for advice, he hasn't given me any either," he said. "There's only one chancellor, and that's me."
'A distraction'
Putin and Schroeder appear to have built "a genuine friendship, based on trust" back when Schroeder was in power, political scientist Ursula Muench told AFP.
But "it's problematic when a former chancellor uses his past political activities and contacts to make money," she said.
Germany's SPD has historically championed close ties with Russia, born out of the "Ostpolitik" policy of rapprochement and dialogue with the then Soviet Union, devised by former SPD chancellor Willy Brandt in the 1970s.
Successive chancellors continued the policy to varying degrees, including Scholz's centre-right predecessor Angela Merkel who focussed on the economic benefits of dealing with Russia -- a strategy known as "Wandel durch Handel" in German, or "change through trade".
But even among German politicians sympathetic to Russia and its longstanding grievance over NATO's expansion, patience with Schroeder -- who famously celebrated his 70th birthday with Putin in Saint Petersburg -- is running out.
SPD veteran Rudolf Dressler told Spiegel that Schroeder's behaviour was "embarrassing", and urged the party leadership to ask Schroeder to refrain from commenting on political matters in public.
Opposition politicians and those from the SPD's junior coalition party, the liberal FDP, have called for Schroeder to lose his privileges as ex-chancellor -- including an office with staff and a driver.
German taxpayers should no longer "finance Russian lobbying", MP Volker Ullrich from the conservative CSU party told Bild newspaper, suggesting Gazprom pay for Schroeder's upkeep.
Sudha David-Wilp, deputy director of the German Marshall Fund think tank in Berlin, said the latest Schroeder saga was "a distraction" in the Ukraine crisis, but nothing new.
"Everybody knows where Schroeder stands, everybody knows where he is getting his source of income from," she told AFP.
More interesting is how Scholz and the SPD choose to navigate relations with Russia in the future, she said.
"Is there now an understanding that 'Ostpolitik' or 'Wandel durch Handel' is a thing of the past? Or will they keep using the same formula?" she asked.
-
-
-
-
J.K. Rowling Faces Criticism for Transgender Comment
in Politics and World Events
Posted
"My PTSD makes me feel that this must be true, my feelings would never lead me to a wrong belief" was the entire [logically fallacious] foundation of Rowling's rambling essay.