Jazzy Jan Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Trump is crazy. This powertrip is beyond stupid and incredibly dangerous. It also makes no sense. America already has bases in Greenland and is allies with Denmark and part of NATO so this security excuse is utter bulldust. Americans should feel so angry that their president is threatening their long term allies for his pathetic aim to grab their minerals and assets. It won't wash with the rest of the world. He is destroying the USA's relationship with Europe now. Quote
Cyber-Raga Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, Jazzy Jan said: Trump is crazy. This powertrip is beyond stupid and incredibly dangerous. It also makes no sense. America already has bases in Greenland and is allies with Denmark and part of NATO so this security excuse is utter bulldust. Americans should feel so angry that their president is threatening their long term allies for his pathetic aim to grab their minerals and assets. It won't wash with the rest of the world. He is destroying the USA's relationship with Europe now. Plus i believe it’s all a distraction from the Epstein list and the tanking economy. Disgusting and pathetic excuse for a human being. Quote
runa Posted January 11 Posted January 11 In the New York Times he said his only limit is his morality… Since he has no moral, we know he has no limits. And he clearly stated he doesn’t care about International Laws. Megalomaniac and Autocrat. Scary. Our only hope is the US military. Never thought I would say that one day. Quote
Ciccone's Cheeks Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Trump/US are absolutely worldwide pariahs now. Sorry not sorry it's package deal. This isn't an opinion at all. It's always been a fact. POTUS was & will always be THE face, voice, values and core of who/what represents & got a mandate from all Americans. I know 75+ mill. did NOT vote for him/loathe him & x-amount didn't even vote. BUT 77 mill. DOLTS voted FOR this. lol That is what's magnified. Not who 'lost' or didn't vote for him, didn't care for both choices, Kamala's annoying cackle or Biden's broiled mind etc.. lol All irrelevant now. Tough shit esp. to the 'regretful Trump voter' lmao. Now they indefinitely gotta deal w/ the backlash & instantly being labeled and mocked as shit stains for brains. Gonna take many, many years...likely decades tbh to fully recover/repair/*convince previous allies all Americans are NOT outta their broken, rubble minds. And...it's still technically not even ONE full year yet! If I was a Brit. or Aussie etc...& overheard a Gen X or Boomer US Anglo Karen/Ken looking & sounding person in my country would instantly be like hearing someone from Iraq or Afghanistan etc...in 2001-2003 in the US esp. NYC. Fact. I'd be uneasy at best. Quote
Ciccone's Cheeks Posted January 11 Posted January 11 4 hours ago, runa said: In the New York Times he said his only limit is his morality… Since he has no moral, we know he has no limits. And he clearly stated he doesn’t care about International Laws. Megalomaniac and Autocrat. Scary. Our only hope is the US military. Never thought I would say that one day. Why do I keep thinking he meant to say his *morTALity lol. I'm not the only one. Quote
Cyber-Raga Posted January 11 Posted January 11 30 minutes ago, Ciccone's Cheeks said: Why do I keep thinking he meant to say his *morTALity lol. I'm not the only one. He keeps talking about death and asking whether he‘ll go to heaven. No bitch, you are the last one to enter the Garden Eden if it exists, lolz. It’s so obvious that this pig has a terminal disease and instead of being taken care of by loving family, which of course he doesn’t have, the world is subjected to his narcissism and whatever disease he has on top of that - judging by his behavior and the way his slurring has increased, his cankles the size of an elephant, it’s gotta be a cardiac disease combined with a form of dementia. Quote
Supernatural Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Yeah he's on his way out the way he's been talking (he always gives himself away). OH WELL Quote
elijah Posted January 13 Posted January 13 On 1/11/2026 at 8:02 PM, Ciccone's Cheeks said: Trump/US are absolutely worldwide pariahs now. Sorry not sorry it's package deal. This isn't an opinion at all. It's always been a fact. POTUS was & will always be THE face, voice, values and core of who/what represents & got a mandate from all Americans. I know 75+ mill. did NOT vote for him/loathe him & x-amount didn't even vote. BUT 77 mill. DOLTS voted FOR this. lol That is what's magnified. Not who 'lost' or didn't vote for him, didn't care for both choices, Kamala's annoying cackle or Biden's broiled mind etc.. lol All irrelevant now. Tough shit esp. to the 'regretful Trump voter' lmao. Now they indefinitely gotta deal w/ the backlash & instantly being labeled and mocked as shit stains for brains. Gonna take many, many years...likely decades tbh to fully recover/repair/*convince previous allies all Americans are NOT outta their broken, rubble minds. And...it's still technically not even ONE full year yet! If I was a Brit. or Aussie etc...& overheard a Gen X or Boomer US Anglo Karen/Ken looking & sounding person in my country would instantly be like hearing someone from Iraq or Afghanistan etc...in 2001-2003 in the US esp. NYC. Fact. I'd be uneasy at best. Actually I am not convinced that most Americans regret having him represent them. There are enough red states where the populace see Europe as "free riding" on USA military umbrella. Actually I do not think soon (unless FAR RIGHT and fascist speech is forbidden in USA) there will be approachment between USA and EU. EU are acting absurdly. They should be signing a treaty already 1) establishing an EU army (that includes UK and Canada parts) that unites all armies of the EU states that have signed it 2) that stipulates that foreign affairs of the EU shall be decided ONLY with qualified majority AND 3) that only EU states (plus UK and Canada) that have signed that treaty are to be protected by the EU army. Those 3 matters should be a PACKAGE DEAL. That would leave off Hungary to deal with Putin or/and Trump alone. And that treaty should be applied from signing until the ratification is finalised. The EU army should have been already established. That's the only way to deal with Trump. And that army should have been sent to Greenland. Quote
Je5u5 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 49 minutes ago, elijah said: The EU army should have been already established. Oh yes. Quote
Sanctuary1995 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 I wonder if the European army would be comparable with the American and the Chinese. Quote
Raider of the lost Ark Posted January 14 Posted January 14 11 hours ago, Sanctuary1995 said: I wonder if the European army would be comparable with the American and the Chinese. The EU has almost the exact same amount of active duty soldiers as U.S. forces. BUT the U.S. is only able to send an estimated 250.000 soldies to Europe, because they are too far involved around the globe and cannot afford to send troops from other regions without the risk of losing influence in that region. Influence they have been craving for for at least 80 years. As far as I know, the U.S. have a far bigger airforce, whereas the EU has a bigger navy. The number of tanks is almost the same. Of course, the arsenal of nuclear weapons does not need to be discussed. The bigger issue is that all those EU countries use different weapon systems, which are very hard to connect to other weapon systems. THIS is the real advantage of the U.S. forces. That all their systems, and they don't have that many, are interconnected. And the U.S. is better at logistics. Well, if a country constantly involves itself in every conflict around the globe, surely they have more expertise. The thing is, the U.S. cannot risk a military conflict with the EU. Not because they would lose some sort of war. But the U.S. needs the EU as a strategic partner and most above all as a market for their products and services. Furthermore, European countries hold a lot of U.S. debt, if they all decided to get rid of it, it is highly likely to crash the U.S. economy and it will end the dollar based world economy as we know it. It will harm the EU countries as well, no doubt about it. In the end, the US are not as invulnerable as they think. Quote
acko Posted January 17 Posted January 17 On 1/13/2026 at 7:38 PM, Je5u5 said: Oh yes. Guy Verhofstadt has been going on about this since the 90s and just about everyone mocked him for it. Anyway, fuck America. Quote
promise to try Posted January 17 Posted January 17 14 hours ago, SOON said: if this is his only answer to the world being against him invading Greenland, then we are safe.well, until his next tantrum Quote
Cyber-Raga Posted January 17 Posted January 17 He’ll do just about anything to avoid releasing the Epstein Files. Fascist cunt. Quote
sotos8 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Αργοπεθαίνω! pic.twitter.com/M1iZT9zbk8— Η όρεξη του eater (@horexitoueater) January 16, 2026 Quote
vesper_wolf Posted January 17 Posted January 17 I wonder how US citizens feel about recognising evil in Russia's invasion of Ukraine in relation to their president simply spilling US needs Greenland. Like, what's the difference? And honestly this is not just a Trump problem. Every administration, left and right, had a history of inflicting war around the globe, all the while the left wing presidents were receiving Nobel prizes for peace in a blatant display of hypocrisy. Trump is just an arrogant idiot who just doesn't know how to wear a mask. Quote
runa Posted January 17 Posted January 17 3 minutes ago, vesper_wolf said: I wonder how US citizens feel about recognising evil in Russia's invasion of Ukraine in relation to their president simply spilling US needs Greenland. Like, what's the difference? And honestly this is not just a Trump problem. Every administration, left and right, had a history of inflicting war around the globe, all the while the left wing presidents were receiving Nobel prizes for peace in a blatant display of hypocrisy. Trump is just an arrogant idiot who just doesn't know how to wear a mask. According to Politico, 75% of Americans oppose Trump’s push on Greenland: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/15/trump-greenland-poll-00731009?utm_source=semafor Quote
vesper_wolf Posted January 17 Posted January 17 5 minutes ago, runa said: According to Politico, 75% of Americans oppose Trump’s push on Greenland: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/15/trump-greenland-poll-00731009?utm_source=semafor Is that a nationwide poll, something like a referendum result, or a poll from CNN that MAGAs (who elected Trump with majority) don't watch? Cause if it's the latter, we should repeat the same exercise on FOX news and then calculate the real results... Quote
Sanctuary1995 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 24 minutes ago, runa said: According to Politico, 75% of Americans oppose Trump’s push on Greenland: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/15/trump-greenland-poll-00731009?utm_source=semafor The cuntfaces in the White House don’t give a fuck about any polls Quote
runa Posted January 17 Posted January 17 15 minutes ago, vesper_wolf said: Is that a nationwide poll, something like a referendum result, or a poll from CNN that MAGAs (who elected Trump with majority) don't watch? Cause if it's the latter, we should repeat the same exercise on FOX news and then calculate the real results... The study was conducted for CNN via web and telephone on the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel of U.S. adults ages 18 or older recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. SSRS is an independent research company. Surveys were obtained January 9-12, 2026, with a representative sample of n=1,209 respondents. The margin of sampling error for total respondents is +/-3.1 at the 95% confidence level. The design effect is 1.3. Quote
runa Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Just now, Sanctuary1995 said: The cuntfaces in the White House don’t give a fuck about any polls Of course he doesn’t. Which dictator does? Quote
vesper_wolf Posted January 17 Posted January 17 34 minutes ago, runa said: The study was conducted for CNN via web and telephone on the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel of U.S. adults ages 18 or older recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. SSRS is an independent research company. Surveys were obtained January 9-12, 2026, with a representative sample of n=1,209 respondents. The margin of sampling error for total respondents is +/-3.1 at the 95% confidence level. The design effect is 1.3. Thanks, phew, now that's encouraging. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.