Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, SOON said:

 

Barred forever or for a little while? Turned out great for Trump in the long run. It was all publicity for him in the end. 

Posted
4 hours ago, ULIZOS said:

Barred forever or for a little while? Turned out great for Trump in the long run. It was all publicity for him in the end. 

Racist Barbie is ineligible for the presidential election for a period of 5 years (therefore for the next one in 2027).

Posted

Yeah but she has a sexy puppet, full of charisma (but empty head 🌀) - watch him become President in the next election. 

Posted

This is unfortunately true. Racist Barbie remained a hindrance to the party's victory because the Le Pen brand remains radioactive among a portion of the electorate. Bardella and the party will be able to play the victim card to surf all the way to the Élysée.

Posted

Either way it‘s s good day that Nazi Barbie has seen some consequences for her actions. Obviously that doesn’t mean that her party is done or even the danger is over.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

she shouldn´t do it. I mean, they say that about her, about michelle, about pedro sanchez´s wife...there´s a pattern, if they believe your husband is not right winged enough, they start saying you used to have a dick.

Posted
21 hours ago, promise to try said:

she shouldn´t do it. I mean, they say that about her, about michelle, about pedro sanchez´s wife...there´s a pattern, if they believe your husband is not right winged enough, they start saying you used to have a dick.

I think it is time that they fight back and take action. Afterall it is their life and no one from outside should take over control over someone elses life, especially on such intimate matters. People like Candace Owens have their very own view on what freedom of speech means and it includes lying and hating. Unfortuantely, the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that all of this is perfectly fine and that even hate speech is covered by the first amendment. Which makes the current action taken by the Trump administration even more laughable, in their call to punish all people who say soemthing negative about Kirk or Trump. Of course, in their mind, certain freedom is only guranteed to them, the rulers and everyone who associates with them, not for the rest of the population. It is very obvious that the US freedom of speech is out of control and in the times we live in, outdated. There is a reason why basically all other democratic countries have freedom of expression/opinion, not freedom of speech, because there is a huge difference. There is a reason why most counries in Europe have laws that that punish lying about the Holocaust. Lying about the Holocaust or other atrocities commited by the Nazis, all of them documented in detail, is not an opinion and is therefore not protected by the basic rights/constitution.

I applaud, Brigitte Macron for taking such a decisive step and her courage. I can only imagine what she means with photographic evidence. And I hope, Candace Owens will be sued for all the money she has. This will teach other right wing influencers a lesson and other victims of slander will come forward and sue as well. Lying, especially about other people, should not be rewarded and should not be a business model. 

In regards to the listeners and believers of Candace Owens and others, they should question themselves what their issue actually is. And in the Macron case it most definitely has something to do with mysoginy and the ageism. I mean, there is something clearly wrong in ones head, if you reject that idea that a loving relationship between a man, a leader of a nation no less, and a woman, 25 years older, can exist. This can't be true. It is more plausibe that this woman has a dick. :doh:

Posted

The transvestigation stuff needs to be nipped in the bud with a few high profile defamation cases. We don't need this new, somehow dumber, McCarthyism. I hope the Macrons will eviscerate that fatuous idiot, Candace, and sue her for all she's worth, for all to see. Whack her good!

Posted
On 9/22/2025 at 1:51 PM, Raider of the lost Ark said:

I think it is time that they fight back and take action. Afterall it is their life and no one from outside should take over control over someone elses life, especially on such intimate matters. People like Candace Owens have their very own view on what freedom of speech means and it includes lying and hating. Unfortuantely, the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that all of this is perfectly fine and that even hate speech is covered by the first amendment. Which makes the current action taken by the Trump administration even more laughable, in their call to punish all people who say soemthing negative about Kirk or Trump. Of course, in their mind, certain freedom is only guranteed to them, the rulers and everyone who associates with them, not for the rest of the population. It is very obvious that the US freedom of speech is out of control and in the times we live in, outdated. There is a reason why basically all other democratic countries have freedom of expression/opinion, not freedom of speech, because there is a huge difference. There is a reason why most counries in Europe have laws that that punish lying about the Holocaust. Lying about the Holocaust or other atrocities commited by the Nazis, all of them documented in detail, is not an opinion and is therefore not protected by the basic rights/constitution.

I applaud, Brigitte Macron for taking such a decisive step and her courage. I can only imagine what she means with photographic evidence. And I hope, Candace Owens will be sued for all the money she has. This will teach other right wing influencers a lesson and other victims of slander will come forward and sue as well. Lying, especially about other people, should not be rewarded and should not be a business model. 

In regards to the listeners and believers of Candace Owens and others, they should question themselves what their issue actually is. And in the Macron case it most definitely has something to do with mysoginy and the ageism. I mean, there is something clearly wrong in ones head, if you reject that idea that a loving relationship between a man, a leader of a nation no less, and a woman, 25 years older, can exist. This can't be true. It is more plausibe that this woman has a dick. :doh:

I understand everything you say, but, if she needs to prove that she is a biological woman,  in a way, like saying it´s something bad not being a biological woman. It´s her right if she is, to prove it, but if she is not, is her right to be respected. I prefer what Michelle Obama or spain´s president´s wife is doing, just don´t paying attention to the stupid news-propaganda of the far right

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...