Twitter and Elon Musk

[Jazzy Jan]

10 hours ago, acko said:

Italy as a culture to dissapear 

Just fucking die already. 

He is an idiot and a dangerous sociopath. 

Italy and Japan's cultures will never die or disappear.  He is talking absolute rubbish but I suppose his brain dead followers who adore him will just nod and agree.  The same brain dead people who say that was not a Nazi salute and don't see any comparison with him endorsing the ultra far right group in Germany.  The same people who think that  single photo mid action shots of celebrities raising their hands or waving are the same as video footage of his salute.  When I see online all of these crazy sites defending him and denying the salute ( and people falling for it )  I despair for the world.  

[SOON]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[SOON]

 

 

 

[SOON]

 

[SOON]

 

[promise to try]

10 hours ago, Camacho said:

 

I can´t wait until they start having problems and hating each other, and saying crap one to the other publicly

[Cyber-Raga]

25 minutes ago, promise to try said:

I can´t wait until they start having problems and hating each other, and saying crap one to the other publicly

You know the day is inevitably coming. It will be a good day. 

[Sanctuary1995]

56 minutes ago, Cyber-Raga said:

You know the day is inevitably coming. It will be a good day. 

A union of two narcissist substances is never sacred

[runa]

There’s something very insane when you have so much power and you decide to take it to attack 10 people. 

Like @ULIZOS said a few days ago: it’s all smoke an mirror, at this point, to hide their real agenda.

 

 

[SOON]

 

[SOON]

 

[Cyber-Raga]

6 hours ago, Camacho said:

 

The other psychopath in the Oval Office will lose his shit when he sees this cover. And I am here for it. 

[promise to try]

17 minutes ago, Cyber-Raga said:

The other psychopath in the Oval Office will lose his shit when he sees this cover. And I am here for it. 

I have the feeling they did it for that!

[ULIZOS]

9 hours ago, Cyber-Raga said:

The other psychopath in the Oval Office will lose his shit when he sees this cover. And I am here for it. 

 

9 hours ago, promise to try said:

I have the feeling they did it for that!

I don't know what happened behind closed doors but when asked all he said was "is Time still in business?" and his team just laughed and they brushed it off... 

Right now they're bulldozing through everything and running on a high from all these Executive Orders, so they're coming off as unbothered. I had a little mental meltdown in the last 3 days (not really, just PISSED THE FUCK OFF), but I'm over it and back to saying we just need to take a deep breath, let the dust settle, and then get ready for the bumpy roller coaster that will be the next 2 years until the next mid term elections. 

What will be scary will be to see what the supreme court attacks next. This one is the worst one and he is on a very clear mission to turn this country into a theocracy. 

[runa]

Tesla Sales Are Tanking Across The World

Tesla shares fell by around 11% last week, weighed down by reports of atrocious sales around the world. Last month, sales reached their lowest level since 2021 in Germany. They also fell in France and the UK. In China, one of Tesla's biggest markets, deliveries fell by 11.5% year-on-year. 

[promise to try]

22 hours ago, ULIZOS said:

 

 

What will be scary will be to see what the supreme court attacks next. This one is the worst one and he is on a very clear mission to turn this country into a theocracy. 

why do you say that?

 

and, we haven´t mentioned the superbowl: did they booed him, or only Taylor? was Kendrick´s performance political or just a bunch of hits one after the other?

[ULIZOS]

8 hours ago, promise to try said:

why do you say that?

 

and, we haven´t mentioned the superbowl: did they booed him, or only Taylor? was Kendrick´s performance political or just a bunch of hits one after the other?

Here's a summary for you: 

Justice Clarence Thomas is an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court known for his ultra-conservative, originalist interpretation of the Constitution, often opposing affirmative action, broad civil rights protections, and federal regulatory power. His wife, Ginni Thomas, is a conservative activist with strong ties to the MAGA movement and was involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in support of Donald Trump. Both have connections to Project 2025, a far-right initiative aimed at reshaping the federal government with hardline conservative policies. Thomas's views align with Project 2025's goals, emphasizing limited government, religious conservatism, and a rollback of progressive legal precedents.

Justice Clarence Thomas has signaled interest in rolling back several key progressive legal precedents, often through his concurring or dissenting opinions. Some notable examples include:

1. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) – Thomas has criticized the decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, arguing it lacks constitutional grounding and infringes on states' rights.

2. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) – He has questioned the constitutional basis for this ruling, which established the right to privacy regarding access to contraception for married couples.

3. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) – Thomas dissented from the ruling that struck down sodomy laws, not necessarily defending the laws themselves but arguing the Constitution doesn’t protect such personal conduct.

4. Roe v. Wade (1973) – Thomas consistently opposed Roe, the landmark decision that legalized abortion nationwide, arguing that the Constitution does not protect the right to abortion and that such decisions should be left to the states. He played a key role in its eventual overturning in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022), which ended federal abortion rights. Thomas joined the majority opinion and wrote a concurring opinion that not only supported the decision but also called for reconsidering other substantive due process cases, such as Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.

5. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) – He has called for reconsidering this landmark First Amendment case that set high standards for public figures to claim defamation, suggesting it gives too much protection to the press.

With the current Supreme Court holding a solid conservative majority, there is a significant possibility that these remaining precedents could also be overturned, reshaping fundamental rights related to privacy, marriage, and personal autonomy in the U.S.

 

[promise to try]

thank you for the explanation Ulizos! shit, this is even scarier!

[ULIZOS]

9 minutes ago, promise to try said:

thank you for the explanation Ulizos! shit, this is even scarier!

Yes! He’s absolutely evil.

But it’s not totally scary, lots of things have happened in anticipation of all the awful things we knew these Nazis were going to do. For example: 

The Respect for Marriage Act, passed in 2022, protects the right to same-sex and interracial marriages in the United States. It ensures that all states must recognize marriages legally performed in other states, regardless of the couple’s sex, race, or ethnicity. The law was passed with bipartisan support in Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden. While it doesn’t require states to issue same-sex marriage licenses if Obergefell v. Hodges were ever overturned, it guarantees that marriages already performed remain valid. Importantly, it also protects federal benefits tied to marriage-like tax benefits, Social Security, and immigration rights-ensuring these rights remain intact no matter where a couple lives. Essentially, it acts as a safeguard to keep marriage rights and protections in place even if the Supreme Court changes its stance in the future.

[promise to try]

but the Respect for marriage act goes state but state? so in one state I can marry you and in another one can it be ilegal?

[ULIZOS]

7 hours ago, promise to try said:

but the Respect for marriage act goes state but state? so in one state I can marry you and in another one can it be ilegal?

The Respect for Marriage Act requires all states to recognize same-sex and interracial marriages that were legally performed in other states, even if Obergefell v. Hodges were to be overturned. This means that if a state were to ban same-sex marriage, it would still be legally obligated to recognize marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples from states where such marriages remain legal.

However, the RFMA does not require states to issue new same-sex marriage licenses if Obergefell were repealed-it only protects the recognition of existing legal marriages across state lines.

[promise to try]

3 hours ago, ULIZOS said:

The Respect for Marriage Act requires all states to recognize same-sex and interracial marriages that were legally performed in other states, even if Obergefell v. Hodges were to be overturned. This means that if a state were to ban same-sex marriage, it would still be legally obligated to recognize marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples from states where such marriages remain legal.

However, the RFMA does not require states to issue new same-sex marriage licenses if Obergefell were repealed-it only protects the recognition of existing legal marriages across state lines.

holy shit. 

Really, Trump is the clown, but the people behind him are even worse

[ULIZOS]

1 hour ago, promise to try said:

holy shit. 

Really, Trump is the clown, but the people behind him are even worse

They're the ones with the brains who actually get all these evil things done. He just says crazy things. 

[SOON]

 

[SOON]

wtf 

 

[Kilt]

47 minutes ago, Camacho said:

 

 

Rules are rules and there's a reason they're in place. Bureaucracy comes with the territory 

You can't skip from 1st grade to college just because one doesn't like that it takes too much time.

[Cyber-Raga]

55 minutes ago, Camacho said:

wtf 

 

Says the person who is running a department which doesn’t have Congressional oversight nor is he an elected represented. 
Nice try distracting people from the real issues. 

[Raider of the lost Ark]

The whole "press conference" was a huge desaster. He said so many contradictory things. He was bashing the unelected bureaurocracy when he and DOGE is exactly that. He was talking about how transparent DOGE is, yet no one knows what they are doing. He was talking about numbers, wasted spending but I wonder why he brings in computer guys and not accountants. One guy, a proud racist, another one with allegations he stole company secrets at a former job. I know why they hired those "nerds" (they had some on a CNN report). They are all sociopaths. They talk tech language, the human aspect does not exist. One guy gave a speech at some AI conference, proudly telling participants that large fields of professions will be made redundant once AI kicks in. There is no empathy at all. But I guess this makes them perfect for this job, they don't see that their decisions have severe consequence onto other humans. 

Also, was Musk super high or what? His cult members always claim he is autistic, has Aspergers. But as far as I understand, he diagnosed himself. That doesn't count. And what about this particular child? Why is he around all the time (whereas you never see the other ones)? Is he a human shield? What purpose does this  child serve? Is he one of his children with a weird name? 

[SOON]

All these clips from today are so idiotic and embarrassing!

 

 

 

[SOON]

“You’re not the President you need to go away”

“I want you to shut your fucking mouth up”