Jump to content
MadonnaNation.com Forums
Sign in to follow this  
ULIZOS

U.S.-Led Coalition Has Used White Phosphorus In Fight For Mosul, General Sa

Recommended Posts

U.S.-Led Coalition Has Used White Phosphorus In Fight For Mosul, General Says

In Iraq, the U.S.-led coalition has admitted — for the first time — to using white phosphorus during operations in the Iraqi city of Mosul.

"We have utilized white phosphorus to screen areas within west Mosul to get civilians out safely," New Zealand Brig. Gen. Hugh McAslan tells NPR. He estimates that around 28,000 civilians have managed to make the dangerous crossing out of Islamic State territory in the past few days alone.

Coalition spokesmen previously have confirmed the use of the incendiary substance in less-populated areas of northern Iraq in the fight against ISIS. But this is the first confirmation that white phosphorus has been used in Mosul.

McAslan says Iraqi forces backed by the coalition have retaken almost 90 percent of western Mosul — the last holdout of the extremists in Iraq's second-largest city. But ISIS still controls a densely populated enclave, where the U.N. says tens of thousands of people remain and have been used as human shields.

The U.N. Human Rights Council says it has received credible reports that ISIS increasingly is targeting civilians as they try to flee, leaving more than 230 dead in recent weeks.

Human rights organizations have warned that the use of white phosphorus to produce obfuscating smoke screens carries deadly risks in an urban setting. Amnesty International says the substance can cause "horrific injuries, burning deep into the muscle and bone." The incendiary substance can reignite weeks after being deployed, causing potential harm to those fleeing or returning.

Amnesty made those warnings in a report documenting the use of white phosphorus east of Mosul in 2016. At the time, it said that the use of the substance in the vicinity of population centers "constitutes an indiscriminate attack and can be a war crime."

White phosphorus, which bursts into flame when it hits oxygen, is not banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention, but its legality is linked to its use. In 2005, the CWC spokesman Peter Kaiser told the BBC that white phosphorus is permitted in war if used to camouflage movement, but not if it is employed as a weapon.

The U.S. military has admitted using white phosphorus in the 2004 battle for Fallujah in Iraq, and in Afghanistan in 2009. Israel used it in the 2008 Gaza war, but said in 2013 that it would stop.

The coalition admission comes amid fresh allegations that white phosphorus also is being deployed in the fight for Raqqa, Syria. There, the U.S. is backing an alliance of Kurdish and Arab partner forces to seize that city from Islamic State control. Those forces have made gains in recent days, pushing into the city for the first time since the campaign began.

In recent days, the ISIS-affiliated media outlet Amaq released a video purporting to show white phosphorus raining down on Raqqa by night. Amnesty International says it has not yet been able to verify the Amaq footage, but is urging U.S.-led forces to refrain from using white phosphorus in Raqqa and its surroundings, where civilians remain trapped. The rights group says the risk to civilians is "unacceptably" high, and could potentially count as a war crime.

The Amaq video prompted rare unity in condemnation from both supporters and opponents of Syria's regime. One supporter tells NPR that contacts inside Raqqa are desperate for leaflets from the coalition telling them where to shelter amid the bombing campaign.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't hear any outcry whatsoever in "the good truthful Western media". Outcries are only reserved and clockwork triggered for agenda fulfillment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, XXL said:

I don't hear any outcry whatsoever in "the good truthful Western media". Outcries are only reserved and clockwork triggered for agenda fulfillment

The headline if it were blaming Assad would be "Assad gasses his own people" with unverified pictures of dying babies and the entire forum would be up in arms :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-06-14 at 5:04 PM, ULIZOS said:

The headline if it were blaming Assad would be "Assad gasses his own people" with unverified pictures of dying babies and the entire forum would be up in arms :lol:

The entire forum, as you say, never post in the politic section. Stop trying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, runa said:

The entire forum, as you say, never post in the politic section. Stop trying.

Stop trying what? All you idiots "know" that Assad "gasses his own people" to death but you don't even know your own countries do it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/06/2017 at 11:04 PM, ULIZOS said:

The headline if it were blaming Assad would be "Assad gasses his own people" with unverified pictures of dying babies and the entire forum would be up in arms :lol:

 

:chuckle:

 

But the 59 launched Tomacock missiles were very real and cost the US taxpayer  $150m in a matter of minutes

Never mind they didn't even target strategic assets, it was more of a "show of force" and a warning to Russia not to disrupt the imperialistic plans for the entire region. Syria, the most cultured and tolerant among Muslim nations, but no, no way,  the EU, the US, NATO, the damned Vatican and the saint Western world in general has no qualms whatsoever about crawling in bed with a Saudi Arabia or a Israel, for that matter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×