dubtronic Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 http://ultimate-madonna.com/gallery/albums/00aPHOTOSHOOTS/md14/versace37.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shine Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 5428 x 7230 - 25.1 Mbhttps://www.sendspace.com/file/4dsdtu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy0623 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy0623 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 omg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Barthes Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 First post and you do this. Flush is gonna come soon..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasticlimbo Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasticlimbo Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 First post and you do this. Flush is gonna come soon..... Have or not sense of humour? Ban or not? And this close up was posted before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Have or not sense of humour? Ban or not? And this close up was posted before... You need to put the 2 and 2 together. That new poster is obvs bound to be a troll. Just look at it's two posts. 1) posts photo 2) quote photo previously posted why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzy Jan Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 You need to put the 2 and 2 together. That new poster is obvs bound to be a troll. Just look at it's two posts. 1) posts photo 2) quote photo previously posted why? Exactly. Why post the worst possible photo of Madonna around and then follow it up by posting it again with OMG. This photo is of course being used everywhere on the net to poke fun of Madonna. Why fans want to promote it is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Barthes Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 You need to put the 2 and 2 together. That new poster is obvs bound to be a troll. Just look at it's two posts. 1) posts photo 2) quote photo previously posted why? Thank you Whoop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy0623 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Exactly. Why post the worst possible photo of Madonna around and then follow it up by posting it again with OMG. This photo is of course being used everywhere on the net to poke fun of Madonna. Why fans want to promote it is beyond me. i am not a troll, is this not titled hq outakes of madonna? i just posted a close up of the photo before my post. i've seen madonna twice for every tour starting from drowned world and i was in the golden triangle for mdna yankee stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonski43 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Exactly. Why post the worst possible photo of Madonna around and then follow it up by posting it again with OMG. This photo is of course being used everywhere on the net to poke fun of Madonna. Why fans want to promote it is beyond me. To be fair, that is no way near the worst possible photo of M that's been posted here. There are the pics from the W shoot including the outtakes which are by far the worst ever taken and the awful white outfit for Hard Candy. I think we might be being slightly over sensitive given the recent invasion of newbies. We know the flush will come for the trolls so let's just enjoy weeding out the real ones and wind them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubtronic Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Some Susan pics by Otcoam ¨ https://www.sendspace.com/file/y8n4nh https://www.sendspace.com/file/k3mtho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidLaw Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 (edited) Who took this session and for what? 2000? Edited November 23, 2014 by DavidLaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scamper Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 I've asked the same in other fórum and seems that the picture was taken on 2002. The photographer was Herb Ritts (he died at the end of that year) and is a personal picture. A family portrait for Madonna personal use, not for a magazine or things like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weboguy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 5428 x 7230 - 25.1 Mb https://www.sendspace.com/file/4dsdtu Thank you, Thank you, Thank you so much to whoever leaked this one in HQ. She looks incredible, and yes I do mean even close up. The hallmarks and lines etched into my pop queen idol's face are as legendary as she is. Plus, this was 4 years ago, and I am firmly convinced she looks even more amazing right now! Today! On the eve of a brilliant new album. People who see anything less don't understand love. ...love this photo. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat.Guy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Thank you, Thank you, Thank you so much to whoever leaked this one in HQ. She looks incredible, and yes I do mean even close up. The hallmarks and lines etched into my pop queen idol's face are as legendary as she is. Plus, this was 4 years ago, and I am firmly convinced she looks even more amazing right now! Today! On the eve of a brilliant new album. People who see anything less don't understand love. ...love this photo. <3 +1 She's so beautiful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliebean Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Who took this session and for what? 2000? Herb ritts year 2001. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidLaw Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 I've asked the same in other fórum and seems that the picture was taken on 2002. The photographer was Herb Ritts (he died at the end of that year) and is a personal picture. A family portrait for Madonna personal use, not for a magazine or things like that. Herb ritts year 2001. OK, it's sure that is Herb Ritts.. now: 2001 vs. 2002 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilt Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 OK, it's sure that is Herb Ritts.. now: 2001 vs. 2002 it's from 2002 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliebean Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 if this pic is 2002 that would mean lola is 6 and she looks to small to be 6. so still think it's year 2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scamper Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 I understand what you say, but I think Rocco is too "old" to be just one year... If the pictures were made in the beginning of the year (2002) Lola would be 5 years and 3 months??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliebean Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 true rocco looks about 2 then? but lola looks to small to be 6 confusing. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxcatcher Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 true rocco looks about 2 then? but lola looks to small to be 6 confusing. lol I understand what you say, but I think Rocco is too "old" to be just one year... If the pictures were made in the beginning of the year (2002) Lola would be 5 years and 3 months??? it's from 2002 This pic is from 2002. (14 Sept.2002) leaving her apartment in NY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliebean Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 This pic is from 2002. (14 Sept.2002) leaving her apartment in NY woah she has the same shirt on. could it be from the same day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasticlimbo Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 I am soory I didn't post when it was taken! I am not sure about the photographer, may be Herb, but it's from 2002, indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasticlimbo Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 https://www.sendspace.com/file/no2hlx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Gold Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ WHY WASNT THIS USED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubtronic Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 https://www.sendspace.com/file/j5fh5y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubtronic Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 5428 x 7230 - 25.1 Mb https://www.sendspace.com/file/4dsdtu for the ones who like it retouched, made by Fighter https://www.sendspace.com/file/rnouts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts