ryan Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rachelle of London Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 OF ALL THE PICTURES IN THE WORLD TO PICK FROM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessie Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat.Guy Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Its better than the last one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bluejean Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 They should have used the Miami frizzy hair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted May 19, 2013 Author Share Posted May 19, 2013 Its better than the last one. I actually preferred the other one over this. Someone did some airbrushing to this. The cheeks, arms, and the area around her eyes are all blurry. What they should have done is added some color to her skin, or atleast alter the damn colours! We will never win will we? madfan had fought to have that changed numerous times with a gorgeous photo from the vogue performance, but the guy in charge of the madonna page wasn't having it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whyme? Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 All the pictures on her page are hideous. There's even one where her eyes are closed and her head points down. Who controls this?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted May 19, 2013 Author Share Posted May 19, 2013 All the pictures on her page are hideous. There's even one where her eyes are closed and her head points down. Who controls this?? some fuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bluejean Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Probably a Gaga fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessie Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 How can someone be "in charge" on something from wikipedia? Isnt it supposed to be open for anyone to edit it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingvirtue Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 They should have used the Miami frizzy hair You signature picture would be perfect! I love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingvirtue Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 You signature picture [from the Blond Ambition Tour] would be perfect! I love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingvirtue Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Oops, thought I was editing the first post, sorry!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPowered Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Your kidding, right? This guy, and it's obviously a guy with no tatste, needs to be dismissed from his position. Everytime you are trying to change or edit something he's changing it right back to the way it was wether it's right or wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 really a photo of her armpit lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonski43 Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Your kidding, right? This guy, and it's obviously a guy with no tatste, needs to be dismissed from his position. Everytime you are trying to change or edit something he's changing it right back to the way it was wether it's right or wrong. It may be because the images people post are copyrighted. You can only use pictures on wikipedia that aren't copyrighted which isn't as easy as it sounds as many of the pics of M on the web will be owned by paparazzi or press agencies. However, 'Legolas' who dominates the Madonna pages is terrible at overriding others. I wanted to complain but the complaints procedure was too complicated and I just think there's better things to do with my life. But it does bug me that the first album discography is wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat.Guy Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 I actually preferred the other one over this. Someone did some airbrushing to this. The cheeks, arms, and the area around her eyes are all blurry. What they should have done is added some color to her skin, or atleast alter the damn colours! We will never win will we? madfan had fought to have that changed numerous times with a gorgeous photo from the vogue performance, but the guy in charge of the madonna page wasn't having it! Yeah I agree with you. I just think is better because is more recent. 2007 is too far away already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Hm, better than before. However, that's not August 2012, must be before as she switched to the jacket at the l'Olympia gig, which was July 20-something. Why does her face look so grey and her hair so ginger? Definitely some editing there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoogieWoogie Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 It's the date she had free pussy riot scrawled on her arms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilt Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 It's the date she had free pussy riot scrawled on her arms That's either Nice ord Zurich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carta Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 It's Nice. There's a discussion in the "Talk" section of the page. A guy submitted a bunch of photos taken by a photographer who attended the concert, Wikipedia approved them for use, and an editor called "Indian" (whom I've dealt with and he's very reasonable - he edited an article because I proved to him that the reference did not contain the info attributed to it) asked people to vote on which picture they thought was best, because he felt it was time to change the photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 Awful lighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rachelle of London Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 could Guy Oseary change the pic, surely he must own some pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat.Guy Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 could Guy Oseary change the pic, surely he must own some pics as if he would care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mamifero Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 that guy is obviously NOT a fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXL Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 A vast improvement from the previous one but surely they could have picked a better quality shot from the tour as there are tons out there. She looks nice but the complexion/lighting makes it unflatteringly too white, plus the not very subltle airbrushing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciccone's Cheeks Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 awful :# esp. when theres ENDLESS other, better pics than this one lol. Just the lighting alone making her look pasty white and pale is a major fail. Prob put up by a Monster or Lamb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannylex Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 Awful, the previous one was better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camacho Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vocalism Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 They should use this picture: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts