HolidayGuy

I guess OF doesn't consider nude photos/videos sexually explicit content. To each their own, though I think OF and sites of that nature are kinda silly. At this stage, why pay for that kinda stuff when there are infinite amounts of material out there for no charge? Maybe some think of it like some do physical media- the good feeling that you're paying for it. However, it's not like it's physical porn (DVDs, etc.)- it's internet porn, for cryin' out loud.

Who do they think they're foolin' with the fake Melania? Saw over the weekend a woman that was not her, styled to look like her, with him.

Halle-frickin-lujah.

^Is law-enforcement present to handle such nonsense?

A key item to keep in mind is that, surely, anyone who voted in 2016 and didn't vote for Trump, will not have voted for him this time. On the flip side, we've heard from people who did vote for him in 2016 who did not/will not do so this time. And hopefully there's a good amount of those voters. Let's hope for the best. *group prayer circle may commence now*

Thanks for the heads-up, super. Hope you're doing well.

Oh, yes- that won't be a thing in the future. And it's fair, me thinks. We've seen acts take advantage of that to bolster positions on the singles chart, by tacking a digital download on to the purchase of signed physical singles, that aren't shipped out for some time, and the like.

The rule changes have to do with ticket and merchandise bundles. An act can still release as many versions of an album as they'd like, and sales of those count toward charts. Note: Any album that comes bundled with a digital copy always counted as one sale.

I suspect M contributed all lyrics outside of the opening? Commercially, I don't think it would have mattered what was the lead single. In terms of buzz outside of the charts, though, GC probably would have been a good choice.

Yes, LFM not in the top 10 is rubbish, I tell ya.

10 would new highest, 1 lowest. As much as I'm not a fan of a few tracks, I still rated them in the low C range- ~ 7.0-7.3, which is howI look at it based on a letter-number school-grading system- at least when I was in school way back when.

Sent mine a bit earlier today.

@Shaun I did forget that one. Maybe I should listen to it again. Though I recall not being all that into it when I first heard it. "Medellin" is pretty good, though the album's other Maluma collabo is not a favorite of mine. @Suedehead There haven't been any reports of worldwide sales in some time. Back in the fall, it was reported as 485,000 (which may have been a tad underestimated), and someone had estimated 493,000 ~ mid-January. So, has it crossed 500K by now? Would say it's a good possibility, though some concrete info would be nice.

@Shaun 19 new songs? Did I miss one?

Are we ranking 18 tracks?